Much as it pains me to bring this up, I want to discuss the aftermath of Saturday’s North London derby. As enjoyable experiences go, I had more fun the following morning when I stood in the driving rain for two hours until soaked through to the underwear acting as stand-in coach for my son’s under-9s mini-soccer team. And the kids, cold and soaked as they were, showed more guile and gumption than the bunch of 5ok-a-week professionals I’d had the misfortune to observe impersonating a top-flight team at the atmosphere-free zone that is Arsenal’s Emirates stadium.
Although I should correct that last remark. So bad were Spurs in every department, from formation to tactics to application, and so great was the humiliation heaped upon our sorry heads, that even the Emirates was rocking – this time without the aid of the cringe-inducing Elvis karaoke they use to try and gee the home support up with at the start of the game. With the start of the working week comes the traditional derby dessert of dealing with the smugness, and let’s be honest, ridicule of the other lot’s supporters – and this time it’s all been given extra spice by the Robbie Keane affair.
Big mouth strikes again?
Before the game, the Spurs captain was widely reported as saying Spurs had a better squad than Arsenal, so in the aftermath of Saturday’s shocking showing the word on the street is that the big-timers of Tottenham have proved to be Charlies once again after shooting their mouths off. Or as The Guardian put it, “Talent trumps ego”. But let’s take a look at that story.
As the derby approached, Robbie Keane was one of the players put up for interview by the club. What he said translated into headlines such as “Tottenham’s squad is stronger than Arsenal’s, says Keane” and “Tottenham ready to overtake Arsenal, says Keane”. But if you look at what Keane actually did say, it’s not quite so sexy. “If you look at the two squads, you look at us and think, ‘We’re definitely on a par,’ but that will only be judged at the end of the season.” And “We have to believe now that we are as good as the teams that are up there.”
All of which seems perfectly reasonable, and far from the “baseless boast” Keane was accused of making during a weekend of widespread ridicule. But what was Keane supposed to say? “I think they’re better than us, we haven’t got the same quality in our squad”? Imagine the reaction – he would’ve been slaughtered.
Angling for pearls
The truth of it is, the papers looked for an angle and played it up – that’s what journalists do. The headlines weren’t exactly wrong, but it could reasonably be said that they weren’t entirely accurate either. Of course the headline was never going to be “We might match them but let’s see when the season’s over” – but having cranked up the angle it hardly seems fair for the press to be hammering Keane so hard for the angle it came up with. Although Robbie’s manager Harry Redknapp didn’t exactly help matters by saying “I couldn’t really agree with him” after the game. Not before, you’ll note, but after.
You can bet there won’t be any “Spurs manager says Arsenal are better” headlines worked up from Harry’s quote, and that’s because Harry, very much like Terry Venables before him, knows how to play the media. And here lies the point [cue relieved sighs from readers]. Many footballers and managers complain that the press manufactures stories and stokes controversy by pumping up innocuous statements into big issues. That accusation is not without foundation, as I hope I’ve shown above. I’d also offer the recent spattete between Wigan’s Roberto Martinez and Manchester United’s Alex Ferguson, and the ongoing attempts to inflate the bad patch being experienced by United and England defender Rio Ferdinand into a career-crushing crisis. But in an age when football’s top names either demonstrate a disdain for the press or attempt to micro-manage every mention of their beloved ‘brand’, thereby reducing most coverage to bland PR, the press needs to get its headlines somehow.
Spin city
What we’re left with is a vicious circle. The clubs’ attempts to control the way they are portrayed means most of what is approved or allowed is dull, so the press is forced to spin hard, which in turn aggravates the clubs. And yet it needn’t be like this. Most sports reporters don’t want to stitch anyone up, they just want a decent story. The reason the likes of Redknapp and Venables are so popular is that they provide original insight, for example when Redknapp spoke recently about watching a young Frank Lampard at West Ham out pounding the streets on a Friday night when his mates were out pubbing. At that stage, said Redknapp, he wasn’t the most promising prospect, but he was prepared to work hard on his game and the commitment he showed made his coaches sit up and take notice.
It wasn’t the Watergate tapes, but this was a routine football press conference, not a rendezvous with Deep Throat [not the movie
]. It gave a nice little insight, challenged a few preconceptions about ‘modern footballers’ and gave the press a good angle without giving anything away. No need for hype, no one gets hurt.
So would it be too much to expect that, in a leading club press office somewhere right now, the assembled communications geniuses may be thinking about a revolutionary new strategy? One where, instead of flaunting the strength of the ‘brand’, monetising every mention and sucking the soul out of any conversation, the media strategy focusses on providing genuine insight and access, and trusting that this improves the quality of the conversation? I’ll probably be dismissed as naive, but wily operators such as Redknapp and Venables, to name but two, have proved the value of such an approach.
7 Comments
November 3, 2009 at 1:52 pm
I just don’t get why so many people fall for this sort of chicanery.
As an Arsenal fan myself I know that my club suffers as much as any from the constant spinning of the innocent soundbite into a dramatic headline.
I guess it was just Robbies and Tottenhams turn last week
November 3, 2009 at 1:54 pm
Also, where does personal integrity start and finish in terms of of this type of ‘creative reporting’.
Is it checked in at the door in the morning along with the cap and raincoat, unneeded until the working day has finished.
Joe Kinnear had a point !!!
November 3, 2009 at 2:01 pm
But the papers need an angle, and there isn’t a journalist out there who won’t play up the strongest. That’s what gets readers. Keane wasn’t misreported, but it’s all in the presentation. Where I think there is room for criticism is when the press kicks someone for the spin it’s applied itself!
November 3, 2009 at 2:48 pm
“That’s what gets readers”…
Alls fair in love and war then…??
November 3, 2009 at 3:32 pm
Much of it is the inevitable byproduct of the expanded space (paper and virtually) now made available to sports journalism – if you’re strapped for time and resources, filling your pages with stuff about how two defeats in 10 for Chelsea is a ‘crisis’, or some storm in a teacup bitchslap on what Rafa said about Fergie said about Arsene said about referees is always going to be an option.
It bores me, that stuff, but it clearly, alas, doesn’t bore others (and also offers me part of my living). I’d rather there was more stuff about the politics of League One clubs’ ownership structures, meself, but that’s just me.
November 5, 2009 at 6:38 pm
It goes on beyond football. All day today BBC News have been running with a story about a French Cabinet minister describing David Cameron’s position on Europe as “pathetic”. As usual we never get the original quote or the context. Turns out the original quote was saying how “sorry” the minister was about Cameron’s position. BBC News reacted as if somebody had shot their fox.
November 5, 2009 at 9:35 pm
@ David Hepworth It’s one of the many problems with journalism and how “the angle” and “the story” are given a life of their own by the people creating them. In the case you quote, of course, there is the additional problem of the BBC seeming unable to get to grips with the fact that it’s possible to be critical of the EU without being a loon.